Navigation menu
Optimize music files to reach your device’s sound quality limit, get compatible audio format or save disk space.
Audio file converter software for music production and home hi-end Read more...

7 Keystones of Accurate HiFi Blind Test [Article]

Audio Basis - articles about audio

"Audiophile myths debunked" is one of the popular topics in forums and articles.
As rule, these "myths" is based on listening impressions, unexplained technically or small measurable difference is inaudible theoretically/probably.
To check the "myths" accurately, it's recommended to use a method, that ensures repeatability with the same results in similar conditions.

HiFi blind test is a way of "objective" measurement of "subjective" perception.

Read about the most important things, turning a HiFi test into safe evidence.

Optimize music files
 to reach your device's sound quality limit,
get compatible audio format or save disk space

AuI ConverteR 48x44
 audio file converter software for
 for music production and discerning music lovers

FLAC, DSF, DFF, SACD ISO, mp3, m4a, CUE, CD...
We think about quality. You just work with music.
 since 2011
AuI ConverteR 48x44 - audio converte software
7 Keystones of HiFi Blind Test [Article]


How to estimate sound quality

HiFi blind test is a comparison when a listener (participant) try recognize unknown audible sample.

Sample here is either a recording, or equipment, or software, or apparatus/software mode.

This trial is an attempt to measure non-measurable music feature - perceived sound quality.


Objective here is measurability and repeatability in equal conditions. It's a scientific approach.

Subjective here is human feelings.


Still, we cannot access foreign feelings directly. We cannot listen to music like another person. We cannot be sure, that we feel the same each time even.

We can ask him/her only. But they can't exactly describe their feeling. Especially, it refers to the subtlest details, provided by modern musical equipment, software, HiFi test records.


But we want to know: is it really audible or not?


Double-blind audio test

The main aim of the blind trial is to eliminate the subjective part of perception: price, bias, habit, etc. I.e. probable imaginary perception should not impact the experiment.

Double-blind test is used for the "subjectivity" reduction.


Double-blind test is a trial where neither listener nor the conductor knows what is sample.


Blind test audio

Blind test audio



ABX test for audio

ABX test may be used in ear comparison.

ABX test is a trial where samples A and B may be compared with sample X (either A or B). Listener should recognize what is X (A or B).


ABX test audio

ABX test audio


ABX audio test software

Foobar2000 with ABX test software plugin may be used to ABX test of audio files. However, the author doesn't know what happens with audio stuff when ABX-test-foobar's plugin prepares files before comparison (progress when the plugin start).

For ABX test Mac OS software you can try to find ABXer utility. For iPhone, ABX Tester application exists. Also, cross platform Lacinato ABX is available. The author doesn't learned these pieces of software, so he has no opinion.


If somebody claims that sound is different, it can't measure its audibility. Because we listen in the brains via ears.

Theoretically, measurement tools are more sensitive than human ears. But, without trials, we don't know where is audibility edge of difference.


Audibility edge is:

that cannot be distinguished by human.


Professional double blind test of music equipment is not home entertainment. It is hard long expensive work.

It doesn't necessarily audiophile blind test should be done at laboratory. At home nobody can prohibit us to do it.

But safe trial results are necessary as claim evidences.



What's proper blind Hi-Fi test


Proper blind test should consists these elements:

  1. Methodology
  2. Protocol
  3. Big number of measurements
  4. Listening place
  5. Testing equipment issues
  6. Measurement precision issue
  7. Careful condition control


Test should ensure repeatability in the same conditions.




Trial begins with methodology design. Methodology define trial's:


Methodology should be designed first

Methodology hi-fi blind test audio



Test protocol


Test protocol is paper, where recorded detailed data about conducted trial:


Hi-Fi test protocol

Hi-Fi test protocol


Testing and measurement equipment may be registered with unique identifier of item (serial number, as example).


The main protocol aim is ability to check experiment conditions in case of doubt or to better understand result reasons.



Listening place

To save time several participants may be accommodated in one room. In the room are placed several seat rows.

In the trial result interpretation, necessary take into account:


Speaker have individual radiation pattern.
Frequency response depend on listener place relatively speakers and listening room's walls. Because acoustical rays are interfere, bounce from a surfaces and interfere too.

Read more about loudspeakers...


Impact seat place to audio test results

Impact seat place to audio test results


Anechoic room allow to avoid bouncing. But speaker have different frequency response in the different directions. So different seat places also cause different frequency response in anechoic room even.

Generally, only 1 sitting place in the listening room is recommended.



Testing equipment issues


Testing equipment (apparatus that will tested in the trial) should be checked to workability by way, that may be described in the methodology of the trial.

It is desirable, if testing equipment have unique identifier (serial number). It help to repeat experiment or found difference result reasons in case of doubt.
Because different equipment instances may have various figures and sound differently.


Very important thing!


Human perception edge is close to 1 ... 2 dB of loudness. So 0.1 ... 0.2 dB level normalization of samples is recommended.


Human have limited time of echoic memory (auditory event retaining) [2].
So time sample listening should not be too long. Immediate (real-time) easy switch between samples must be ensured.


Updated: When we compare headphones, tested sample can't be isolated from participant technically. For solving this issue, synthesis of headphone features and comparison via single headphone unit were suggested [3].



Measurement precision issue


In statistical calculations, measurement error values may be different. We don't know it exactly, but accept in first approach, that it have normal distribution [1]. So...


To provide measurement precision X, it is recommended measure value Y with precision X/3 or higher.


As example, we want to provide ear trial measurement precision 1%.

1/1% = 1/0.01 = 100 tryings.

So trying number 3 times higher 300 = 100 * 3 is recommended.


Defined measurement precision should be provided

Measurement precision



Big number of measurements

The ear test have a many variables due human factor, above all.

Somewhat, it may be compensated by big number of tryings, participants, equipment items.


Big participant and trying number is recommended

Big participant and trying number


In the "Measurement precision issue" part was considered example: providing 1% precision.

There are recommended 300 tryings.

However, it don't guarantee 100 % of true.

Participant skills can cause biasing of results, as example.

To compensate it with precision 1%, we should invite 300 = (1/1%)*3 = (1/0.01)*3 participants.

Thus total number of measurements is 90000 = 300 trying * 300 participants

We should account each feature, that can cause mistake probably. To a first approximation, we should invite participants with different skills and groups of participants with same skill should have same number of members.

In the trial conclusions we should group results by participant skills.

General rule:

number measurements is enough,
if adding of several participants and/or tryings and/or equipment items and/or other
impact to results into allowable error margin.



Careful condition control


Conditions define experiment. Changing conditions can bias results significantly.


Careful control of conditions provide the test exactness

Careful control of coditions provide the test exactness



Somebody want to compare DACs. He asks peoples who have the devices, check it on some public HiFi test CD.

These tests, as rule, performed at home without exact condition control. We have experiment at different speakers, listening places, the ambient noise, etc. Even experiment, described in details, may have subtle, at first glance, issues, that impact upon result.


As rule, before experiment we can't know exactly, that details are important in the trial. Only result figures can show, that details are unimportant in our experiment: impact to result into allowable error margin.
As example, we cannot expect listening skill affected trial results. But for some tests, it might be important.





  1. Blind test, double blind test, ABX test are intended to "objective" measurement of "subjective" (immeasurable) perception.
  2. Properly performed and recorded hi-fi blind test may be a serious objective evidence of subjective perception.
  3. The trial may be performed at home for personal purposes, but can't be used as technical evidence.
  4. The trial should be designed, performed in a manner that maximizes independence from number of participants and tryings and/or other. As reference value may be allowable changes into error margin.
  5. The independence is achieved by big number of participants and tryings, equipment items, etc.
  6. Even correctly designed and performed HiFi test don't guarantee absolute truth. Because new knowledge may open new details.


Share the article in the social networks, forums


Frequently Asked Questions

How do you test a blind audio?

To blind test its partisipants should not know what is sounds now. It may require additional equipment.

Read details...


What is blind listening?

Blind listening is means that listener can't see acoustic source.

Read details...



Popular HiFi test kinds


Yuri Korzunov,

Audiophile Inventory's developer



  1. Normal distribution (statistics)
  2. Bob Snyder. Music and Memory: An Introduction
  3. About testing headphones
  4. One of careful test examples
  5. How Well Can You Hear Audio Quality?


Video: Some New Evidence that High School and College Students May Prefer Accurate Sound Reproduction


Read more about HiFi tests


December 20, 2022 updated | since July 19, 2017