What is the CD-ripping hi-fi sound quality
What is the fastest way to rip CDs
How to compare CD rippers
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the CD-ripping hi-fi sound quality
What is the fastest way to rip CDs
How to compare CD rippers
Frequently Asked Questions
Audio Basis - articles about audio
CD ripper software is intended for copying CD audio content to music files on hard disc of a computer. Read below about:
• sound quality,
• different ripping ways (including safe/secure and unsecured),
• ripping formats and settings,
• metadata management;
• Frequently Asked Questions;
• how to choose the best CD ripping software for audiophile.
Disclaimer: The list may contain mistakes and does not reflect the current version of a stand-alone CD ripper software. If table cell is empty, the author hasn't exact information. If you found an error contact us. We produce AuI ConevreR 48x44.
More CD rippers for Ubuntu Linux
Disclaimer: In this article theoretical concepts are discussed. Real software and hardware are not discussed here and may work differently. All stuff here is a personal opinion of the author. And the stuff is based on the author's knowledge at the time of the article writing.
You can meet the topic of the article too often at the forums and articles, like: "the best cd ripping software", "the best cd ripper2023", "the best cd ripper for mac", "the best cd ripper for windows", etc. The rippers are compared by perceived sound quality, functionality, metadata (song information: track name, album, performer, etc.) abilities, ripping speed and other.
However, in the author's opinion, the main feature of the best cd ripping software for audiophiles is the copying exactness of CD binary audio data to music files.
This feature is measurable. But the author doesn't know about studies, that are available for public access.
CD ripping in simple words
Digital music is a number sequence. The numbers are packed in bytes.
Thus, digital audio is a byte sequence. Byte is a piece of digital information.
If one or several bytes are broken, music can get audible distortions.
If a CD ripper can't exactly read values of the bytes, written at a recording studio, we get broken sound.
EXAMPLE:
Remark: It's only an approximate CD-ripping description. The real process is more sophisticated.
At a factory, we should put several ice cubes (bytes) in a box (song on CD).
These cubes are different.
Some of the cubes may be damaged when put in the box or during delivery. It's like, bytes are damaged in manufacturing or another way.
CD ripping is like the creation of cubes into our own box (ripped sound files).
When we study the cubes (read from CD), we can find 3 types of damaged cubes (wrong bytes):
We can look at the cubes (bytes on CD) through different glass types (optical drive with CD ripping software).
The glass type (ripper software and optical drive) defines how exactly we can detect the ice cube size (byte value on CD) and restore the initial cube size into our box (byte value into ripped file).
A safe CD ripper or secure CD ripper is a ripper software that has exactness of binary-content copying as the main aim.
Read below:
Read below the review of audio data integrity control (quality issues), ripping speed and audio-information restoration.
Quality of CD ripping is a number of broken bytes in the ripped files. The best quality is 0 broken bytes.
CD ripping error is a digital audio data difference between original record (binary audio file content that is intended for CD pressing) and audio content of a ripped file.
Original record is an audio file that is used to produce a compact disc.
Correct error detection is a correct detection of real broken byte.
False (wrong) error detection is an error detection for correct music information.
Abbreviations
Maximal CD ripping quality is ripping without errors. I.e. binary music content of a ripped file should be fully identical to original record.
In the first approach, CD ripping software can't improve sound of CD.
The best thing that can do the software is binary-exact copy of music information from optical disc to sound file only.
However, there are some details. If optical drive of computer makes fewer errors, than CD-player device, ripped sound files are closer to the original master record. It's important to remember, that hardware players have their own ways of restoration for broken music.
The word "probably" is used too often in the article, because error rising, correct or false error detection, error fixing are not events with 100% probability.
Yes. Some CD ripping errors are audible. As rule, it may be silence, sound interruption(s), pops/clicks. Rarely, periodical short-time errors may degrade sound not as obvious. It causes a "strange" distorted sound.
Digital music stream faults can cause either clicks or pauses or interruptions or other audible distortions.
There are different ways of ripping-error detection:
In this case CD, audio stream is read:
- without error flags,
- without re-readings,
- with buffering of reading information.
Audio information is corrected by optical drive anyway.
But there are some ways of additional ED are missed (read details "Low-level CD-fault detection" part).
Sometimes, optical device driver of operating system can report about fault, sometimes - not. It depends on implementation driver and operating system. CD ripper doesn't obtain error flags, generated by compact disc drive, and stores music information as is into files.
This secure way calculates ripped CD's checksum. These checksums are collected into an internet database. When you rip CD at the database-compatible ripping software, your rip checksum is calculated and compared with checksums in the database.
But the database doesn't contain original record checksum. So ripped checksum compared with an array of uncertified checksums.
We can hope (without 100% warranty), that the majority (of similar checksums for some CD in the database) is the same checksum of the CD's original record.
But, in instance, if some CD series was manufactured without 100% identity to original studio files (for unknown to us reasons), then we have non-correct majority.
If a CD ripper (that is used for copying the majority) has a non-fixed bug, the same situation may happen too.
Also, rare record or different optical disc versions (pressing, mastering?) issues may be there.
This secure/safe way is based on:
CD-drive can correct faults and restore (with some probability) valid audio information (Reed–Solomon coding) [1][2].
So compact disc drive try to detect faults inside. If it is detected, the drive tries to restore music information. In case of unsuccessful fault elimination, error flag (C2) mark a broken byte.
The safe/secure compact disc ripper software may apply additional fault detection and correction algorithm under data, that was before checked and corrected into CD drive.
Raw audio stream from CD-drive is read with C2 flags, re-readings and with buffering elimination of reading data.
Several re-readings of CD-drive's music data can cause different binary content for re-readings.
This difference combined with С2 flags can give new information about faults, that were probably missed into CD-drive.
One error flag control audio data integrity of 1 byte of the raw audio information. The flag is calculated by CD drive. Probably, some drives can't calculate it. But, I suppose, it is a matter of older drives.
Re-reading is repeated reading of CD track's fragment. Re-reading performed several times.
Buffering elimination is an attempt of forced cleaning of CD data buffer for each re-reading. Re-reading from music data buffer have no sense, because there is same information for each re-reading. But repeatable audio data reading from CD can cause different content in problematical places.
Further, the obtained data array is analyzed to additional ED.
This method also doesn't guarantee 100% probability of audio stream integrity.
However, there is no additional element of uncertainty like a database without original record checksum.
CD extractor can begin to read information at maximal speed to save time. When compact disc ripper read music information and get fault (as from optical disc drive, as by the data analysis), it can reduce reading speed to safer extracting. Of course, it consumes more time.
Ripping speed depends on own CD drive's correct reading ability.
CD reading speed should provide maximal available safety of extracted music information.
If CD ripper use re-readings, it decreases total ripping speed anyway, even for constant rotary speed.
Because in safe/secure mode compact disc is read several times, instead one time in unsafe mode.
Correct error-detection is an event when both sources (safe CD ripper and checksum database) detected "ripped information is valid".
Warning:
"Correct error-detection" and "correct ripping" are different events.
"Correct error-detection" happens when a ripper detect errors correctly relatively binary content of source studio audio file, that is used to CD manufacturing.
"Correct ripping" happens when binary audio content of ripped file is identical to binary content of the source studio audio file.
If "correct error-detection" is happening, it means that "correct ripping" doesn't happen.
Total correct error-detection probability (CEDP) of the safe ripper:
CEDPcd is [CD drive + CD ripper] system's correct ED probability (CEDPcd <= 1.0)
CEDPdb is the dababase's correct ED probability (CEDPdb <= 1.0)
Ideal theoretical value of CEDPcd and CEDPdb is 1.0. But real values are lesser 1.0 always.
Result of multiplication CEDPcd to value, that lesser 1, is lesser than CEDPcd.
Thus, CEDPwd < CEDPwod ("with database" lesser than "without").
There is no known information, what is higher: correct ED probability of [CD drive+ripper software] system or database.
Simultaneous use of both methods reduces total correct error-detection probability of CD ripping.
Generally, separate using only one of these two methods is recommended to decrease result uncertainty.
You can choose method, that is more suitable for you by other functionality (data restoration, in instance, or other).
Though mistake in method choice can cause lesser total correct error detection probability.
The ripper software read data array (raw audio data and error flags after several re-readings) and use it to create probable correct content at damaged places (without 100% guarantee, of course).
Some data can't be restored (fatal faults).
Read about one of safe CD ripping technology >
If your aim is binary audio data capturing as is, use any lossless PCM format (WAV, FLAC, AIFF, ALAC, APE, etc.).
If your aim is lossless file size reducing, use FLAC.
If your aim is maximal file size reducing - use mp3 or AAC format.
However, for optical discs, ripping to backups in lossless file formats (WAV, FLAC, AIFF) is recommended.
After it, you can convert these lossless backups to mp3, DSF or other format.
It allows saving time of slow audiophile ripping procedure.
Read what is the best CD ripping format >
Most complex ripping part is safe reading from optical disc. For some discs, it may be unstable.
Generally ripping into 16 bit / 44.1 kHz PCM backup (WAV, FLAC, AIFF, etc.) without any processing is recommended.
Check your CD ripper settings to turn off any processing (resampling, dithering, gain, etc.).
These ripped backups you can use for further conversions to target musical devices (portable audio player, mobile phone, car audio, music server, etc.).
Fortunately, we can objectively compare CD rippers by ripping quality.
This comparison can't cover all cases. Because test result can depend on damaging kind of test CD.
1.1. CD rippers
1.2. CD-drive(s)
1.3. Test CDs with binary identical WAV files per track.
The test CDs should have different
1.4. Tool for binary comparison of WAV files.
2.1. Rip the test CDs to WAV files for different combinations:
a) CD ripper software
b) Compact disc drive
c) CD ripping mode (speed, overlapping, re-reading number, recovering, etc.) if available.
2.2. Compare ripped WAV files with original files (sources of tracks of the test CDs) via binary comparison tool (goal 1.4):
a) Length in bytes from beginning of the track to first detected (via binary comparison) fault byte.
Register it in results as mark of steadiness CD extractor to fault appearing.
b) Percent of detected (via binary comparison) wrong bytes to total number of bytes in track.
Register it in results asmark of ability CD extractor to fault avoiding.
During WAV file binary comparison need consider audio data only (pass by WAV’s header and non-audio chunks).
Recommended provide several times (10 and more) rippings in combination
{[test CD]+[CD ripper]+[CD ripping mode]+[CD drive]}
It needs to be addressed possible byte offset between original WAVs and ripped ones.
If the offset is present, superpose original and ripped WAV files.
To superpose refer to identical binary sequences of audio data. Found identical binary sequences in original and ripped WAV files and shift compared binary content to match the sequences.
As begin of track considered begin of original WAV's audio data.
3. Comparing results of the tests
Integral mark of the tested system [ripper + ripping mode + CD drive] is averaged by different test CDs.
Test resume makes by comparison of the integral marks of the systems.
Some CD rippers are able to automatically request of track metadata (metatags): song and album name, year, performer for internet database.
Some databases contain album artworks.
When ripping is started, the ripper forms an unique ID of compact disc by its track start addresses, in instance.
Sometimes database contains several entries for a single disc (in instance, at different languages).
Some rippers enable to assign metadata and/or album artwork file manually before or after ripping.
There are databases:
Free:
Commercial:
The best way to rip CD-audio is using of a system (CD-ripper software + optical disk drive), that cause lesser reading error number. Such things as jitter, color marker pen to covering disk surface or side and other same things is not matter for you. Read details...
Read also:
What's the best ripping format...
The best way to digitize your CD-audio collection is using of a CD ripping software.
CD rippers have different methods of audio data reading from compact disc.
Read more about:
As far as the author knows, it's too difficult to find technically correct CD ripper comparison in public sources. The comparison should show error that a tested ripper brings to output sound files.
However, you can try to make own comparison even at home.
To protect full audio information of CD, it should be ripped in 44.1 kHz / 16 bit without audio processing.
Some CD rippers may detect and correct errors. But it's doesn't mean that original audio data will be restored with 100% warranty.
Read details...
If you want to optimize ripped stuff to your DAC, read the article...
CD contains already digital audio. You can copy its content directly in the digital form. Read more...
If an audio compact disk contains serious or too many errors, it can not be ripping with proper sound quality. Also, the CD may be compressed special way.
Fastest way is rip CD is rip it at maximum sampling rate without repeatable reading. However, it's not safe way of compact disc ripping in some cases. Read more...
Read the guide How to rip CD...
Read how you can rip a CD on a Mac...
You can rip a CD audio on your Mac without iTunes. Read how to do it...
How to rip a CD to lossless audio on Mac, read the guide...
You can transfer music from a CD to a USB-storage on a Mac via CD ripper software.
Select a directory on the storage as taget folder for files that extracted from the compact disk.
To convert a CD to mp3 on a Mac you can use CD ripping program.
Read the user manual: How to rip CD on Windows...
First aim is exract CD content with original quality (resolution 16 bit / 44.1 kHz) without errors. If you want to optimize ripped music files to your audio system, you can resample this resolution in ripping or later. Read details...
Most of CDs contains uncompressed PCM in 16 bit / 44.1 kHz.
However, there are DTS- and MQA-CDs.
Read more about audio formats...
There are several reasons:
Read the user manual: How to rip CD [Mac, Windows]...
To look for best free CD-ripper, see the list...
Some ways of CD ripping can cause an additional mechanical load to CD. But, the author knows nothing about CD, damaged by ripping.
Fast or express CD ripping on first speed is the same usual CD playback.
Best quality to rip CD is ripping without digital data errors.
Also, you can adapt ripped music to you digital-to-analog converter.
Read more...
Read quick start guide...
Ripping to FLAC has the same quality WAV. But it allow saving hard-disk-drive space. It is especially important for mobile devices. Read quick start guide...
In general, VLC can rip CD. As the author know, additional efforts are need to batch ripping. Maybe latest VLC version solve the issue.
As the author know, Audacity can't rip CD. However, under Mac, CD is mounted as a HDD with .aiff files, that contains audio data. However, undetected CD errors may be matter for this access type to compact disc.
Read how to rip CD-audio in various file types...
Yes. iTunes has functionality to rip CD.
ALAC, AIFF or WAV audio formats are recommended. Sampling rate and bit depth choose according to your DAC.
Read more...
iTunes store is replaced by Apple Music, Apple TV, Apple Podcasts.
Apple Lossless is lossless audio format. It provides highest sound quality.
About alternatives read here...
Yes. Both Apple Lossless and FLAC formats are lossless.
Read more...
You can rip your CDs to computer files. Read details...
One compact disk has size about 600 GBytes. 2TB holds about 333 CDs.
The main useful audio ripper feature is copying exactness of audio data from compact disc to file. In the ideal case the data should be extracted without changes.
For valid CDs it does not matter. In the first approach, all CD rippers will work identically there. Except for false error detection case.
But some CDs, especially damaged, may contain errors. And CD extractor should found the faults. It's desirable, the ripping software attempt to restore damaged data that was found.
I.e. we can choose (as the best) the ripper that makes minimal fault number in ripped data.
In the article comparison method of audio rippers is suggested.
Unfortunately, the author doesn't meet results of independent ripper quality researches in the open sources.
Using of checksum database allows comparing own ripping results with other ones, but original record checksum is unknown.
The author rather recommend to choose one of CD rippers (free or paid), that have low-level error detection with CD drive, providing C2 error flags. It enables direct control over ripping errors without referring to uncertified third-party sources.
Simultaneous use of both methods is not recommended, because case, that both methods show different results, is probable.
The simultaneous use can reduce the probability of correct error detection.
Yuri Korzunov,
Audiophile Inventory's developer
