audio file converter for music production and hi‑end audio
Audiophile Inventory on Facebook Audiophile Inventory on Twitter Audiophile Inventory on Instagramm Audiophile Inventory on Pinterest Audiophile Inventory on Telegram Audiophile Inventory on YouTube

Best Format to Rip CD Audio [Read Definitive Guide 2019]

Audio Basis - educational articles

CD ripper extract compact disk audio data to number formats, convert CDs to digital music library. Read how to choose the best format to rip CD audio, what is difference between the formats.

• DSF, DFF, ISO (1-bit audio) is supported in maximal PROduce-RD and configurable Modula-R
• For ISO tracks, DSF, DFF with length more 3 minutes FREE demo mute 2 second silence in the output middle
• DVD ISO is NOT supported

Watch and share: video about safe audio ripping

Ripping is not 100% safe. Wrong data reading from compact disk is possible. The best CD ripping software for audiophile should detect compact disk errors as better as possible.

First aim of CD ripping is maximally qualitative CD-audio-data copy to sound file without audio processing of music.

Further these data may be converted to other formats and resolutions by your option.



Lossless files are recommended as the best format to rip CD:


What is the best audio format for sound quality? All these formats is absolutely identical by binary audio content and able to keep full CD's sound quality.

FLAC and ALAC store compressed data. And we cannot directly compare binary content WAV and FLAC, as example. But we can pack WAV1 to FLAC, unpack FLAC to WAV2 and compare binary content of WAV1 and WAV2. If a conversion software work correctly and without sound processing, the binary content will identical.

There is opinion, that lossless compression (like FLAC) can degrade sound when playback (was discussed here). For that case was implemented so-called "uncompressed FLAC". But the author still don't know about professional researches FLAC vs. "uncompressed FLAC".




Metadata issue


When compact disk is ripped, track metadata (song, performer name, etc.) may be queried from Internet database. So target format must be storing metadata capable. All formats, mentioned in the article, is capable for metadata.

When you use iTunes on Mac, ripping to AIFF, ALAC is recommended, because both formats able to support metadata, that can be read by iTunes software.

When you use Windows or other Mac audio playback software to listening of ripped files, you have many options that have no issues with metadata for WAV, FLAC, AIFF, ALAC.

When you use WAV format, issue with impossibility of reading metadata is more probable. As rule, more playback software/hardware have FLAC metadata compatibility. You can prefer uncompressed FLAC if you more like uncompressed storing of audio data.





Resume: What is the best way to store CDs digitally?


  1. The best way to store CDs is riping to lossless files WAV, FLAC, AIFF, ALAC.
        CD ripping may be performed with errors. If you have ripping seance, that was performed without reported errors, it is recommended to backup the ripped files.
  2. Ripping to lossless formats is recommended for future conversion to other formats and resolutions. In the future may appear more qualitative audio converters and lossy formats.
  3. As rule FLAC have lesser probability of issues with reading metadata (song, performer name, etc.). But for iTunes compatibility AIFF and ALAC is recommended.
  4. If you prefer FLAC due better metadata compatibility, than WAV, but you don't sure that FLAC sound better, than WAV, you can choose "uncompressed FLAC".





Read more articles about CD ripping




The Best Format to Rip CD Audio


Read other articles about audio and ripping

Copyright © Yuri Korzunov
["Audiophile Inventory" (since 2011), "AudiVentory", "Audiophile Inventory by".
Также "Audiophile Inventory by" (прежде "Audiophile Inventory") охраняемое коммерческое обозначение],
2010-2019. All Rights Reserved.
Information at this site is not public offer.

Site map      Terms and Conditions