DSD vs PCM [Myth Debunking, Read Definitive Guide 2022]
audio file converter for music production and hi‑end audio

DSD vs PCM [Myth Debunking, Read Definitive Guide 2022]

Audio Basis - articles about audio

yuri korzunovDSD (DSF, DFF files, SACD) competition with PCM (FLAC, WAV, AIFF, mp3, others) generates many disputes around. But DSD and PCM formats have common features and principles. Read about sound quality comparison, myths and its technical explanation by audio software developer with 25+ years of practical experience in signal processing Yuri Korzunov.



Watch and share: DSD versus FLAC [Format Comparison]


What about PCM versus DSD?


When we think about a new DAC, we ask: Is DSD worth it? What is better: DSD or PCM? What about dsd vs vinyl? Or DSD 2.8 versus 192 24 PCM?

DSD is implemented in:

PCM is implemented in WAV, AIFF, FLAC, ALAC, mp3, CD-audio, etc. (PCM files)

Vinyl, as the analog mechanical source, cause more distortions, than digital DSD. But some audio distortions may be considered as subjective sound advantages. So this matter is complex enough.


Both PCM and DSD are pure digital formats. By summing up some widespread myths:

  1. DSD can be considered as a format superior in audio quality than PCM.
  2. DSD can be "native" edited without intermediate conversion to PCM.
  3. Point 2 gives significant quality losses due to decimation.

Below we will consider technical explanation and debunk these myths.

Watch and share: What is DSD audio?


Read also: DSD vs FLAC >



What is the sound quality of a digital format

First, we can define: what is "sound quality" to discuss below.

For digital audio format, quality is identity degree of waveforms:

  • restored (from the digital form) and
  • original analog one.

There is no mystery. It is fine detected via spectral-time analysis in different forms.

Identity degree may be detected via the measurement of simple difference between original and restored waveforms (sample difference).

However, the spectral method is more informative and sensitive to distortions.


DSD and PCM brief tech

PCM (pulse code modulation) and DSD (sigma-delta modulation) difference is not so great, as it seems at first glance.

Both kinds of modulation contain carried (musical) signal in the lowest part of the spectrum.

DSD and PCM physical principles comparison

Lack of bits is solved via difference in quantization-noise distribution and behaviour.

Noise distribution

For PCM, quantization noise is evenly distributed across range {0 … [sample rate]/2}.

For DSD, noise energy is pushed to the inaudible high part of the spectrum. The pushing is callsed noise shaping.

Significant energy of noise is out of audible range. And the reserve of the total band is needed. I.e., sample rate higher, than for PCM, is required.


Noise behaviour

PCM quantization noise correlates with useful signal: no signal is no noise.

DSD noise doesn’t depend on signal. During silence the noise presents. DSD DAC eliminates this noise.


DSD and PCM tech in depth

Dynamic range

The maximum signal level causes overload.

Minimum signal level less than or equal to quantization noise level (a.k.a. noise floor). Signal "under" noise have bad recognizing.

Simplified dynamic range

Simplified dynamic range


Simplified dynamic range is difference between maximal level and noise floor.

Warning: It is not technically correct definition. But in frame of the article we will use it for easier understanding.


Dynamic range is the difference between maximum and minimum allowable level of signal transmitted thru a unit.


We can discuss dynamic range as common base for both PCM and DSD. Dynamic range is single matter for different bit depth.

Maximal level in the digital audio is accepted as 0 dB. It is not depend on bit depth. But noise floor depend on the bit resolution.


What is bit depth reducing cause? From PCM to DSD

As example, we have a certain noise level for some PCM bit depth.

After the bit resolution reducing, the noise level is higher and dynamic range is reduced.

Bit depth truncating (from PCM to DSD)

PCM bit depth and noise


However noise level may be kept into limited useful frequency band. Noise energy, that grown due bit depth truncating, may be pushed out of the band via noise shaping.


Noise shaping, PCM to DSD transformation

Noise shaping, PCM to DSD transformation


It is very like to DSD. And, yes! It is real multibit DSD!

Read about PCM to DSD conversion and DSD to PCM converters here > and here >


From DSD to PCM (bit depth expanding)

Now let me try to come from DSD to PCM. Here we also have given noise level.

Noise shaping may be characterized by the steepness. Both total and useful audio signal bands define the steepness.


Noise shaping steepness

Noise shaping steepness


Steeper noise shaping may be used to expand the useful band. So DSD 64 vs 128 (5.6 MHz) is matter of the steepness.

Higher steepness can cause lesser stabilty of sigma-delta modulator (noise shaper). So lesser steepness may be good.

Adding bit to sample word decrease noise level. So noise shaper's steepness may be decreased too. Because noise energy, that need to push out of the useful band, is lesser.


Adding bit - lesser the steepness, DSD to PCM transform

DSD to PCM transform


At last the noise floor become flat. So DSD signal is transformed to PCM.


Sample rate

DSD have significantly higher sample rate, than PCM, because band reserve is need to push excess noise energy out of the useful frequency band.

However, even simple band expanding cause lesser noise level. Because quantization noise energy is constant and distributed in full band. Graphically noise energy is square of the noise spectrum. It like to rectangle. If its width is expanded, height (noise level) diminish.


Sample rate and quantization noise level

Sample rate and noise level


Two times band expanding decrease noise level at 6 dB.

So we can say, that DSD decrease noise level twice:

  • by sample rate and
  • by noise shaping.



Nyquist theorem (PCM vs DSD)

The Nyquist theorem is the same for both DSD and PCM. In both cases, the upper half of spectrum like to mirrored lower one. I.e. useful spectrum consumes lower half of the spectrum. The upper half should be filtered to restore analog signal.

For DSD high part of the spectrum into the lower half, should be filtered too. Because it contains high-frequency noise of sigma-delta modulation.



DXD is high-resolution PCM, that is extracted from DSD with the keeping of "legacy" ultrasound noise. DXD compatible hardware must filter the noise. Otherwise, ultrasound noise can cause audible products due to non-linear distortions in playback audio system.

DXD is designed for DSD editing. However, some processing has non-linear distortions and the ultrasound noise can cause audible products.



Each audio application begins from an analog-to-digital converter (ADC).

There are many types of ADC.

ADC must provide suppression of all stuff over [sample rate/2] before analog signal digitizing.

DAC input

Otherwise, the stuff will be shifted/mirrored into the range of the low half of the sample rate. Read more here >

Practically, it is recommended to suppress all above transmitted audio band 0 … 20 kHz (maybe slightly more). It's necessary to avoid transmitting energy excess, that consumes resources of dynamic range.

For PCM and DSD ADC suppression is provided via analog low-frequency filter only. Filter have slope suppression characteristic by frequency (suppression about 20 … 48 dB per octave).

Octave is 2-time difference between frequencies.

More recording sample rate - more suppression - more quality (lesser distortions) of captured sound.

DSD ADC has significantly higher sample rate, than PCM DAC. It provides better suppression in the forbidden frequency range.

All excessive stuff may be filtered in digital form.

Using of resistor matrix in DAC demands very high precision of components and voltage.

The simpler decision is using of fast-growing saw voltage to measure input analog value.

This principle is the principle of DSD. I.e. DSD is simpler/cheaper format for sound capturing, than PCM.




Applying of DSD digital-to-analog converter (DAC) allow maximally simplify scheme and DAC adjusting.

In the first approach, DSD DAC is a simple low-frequency filter (that pass low frequencies - music stuff - only).

Higher sample rate, than for PCM, simplify using of the analog filter.  So steep transient to suppression area, like PCM, is no need.

So many precise components is no need too.

Almost all modern DAC use internal PCM to DSD conversion "on fly" for digital-to-analog conversion.

If use DSD as end-user format,

  • 1 precise reference voltage and
  • simple analog filtering

are needed only.

I.e. same result with fewer efforts than "native" PCM is there.


Read more about PCM and DSD DAC comparison >



Restoring issues of some signals

Not once digitizing/restoring to the analog of the square wave for PCM and DSD was compared.

More steep front and lesser ringing in front/end sides of square impulse are considered as DSD advantage.

Let's consider "ideality" of digitizing/restoring of the square wave.

Square wave has the infinite spectrum. I.e. for ideal digitizing/restoring, infinite sample rate is needed.

The DSD sample rate is significantly higher, than sample rate of PCM. It is the reason for steeper front/end of the square impulse.

Square wave DSD vs. PCM

Lower ringing for DSD is the result of lesser steepness of the filter, than one used for PCM. Because PCM has lower sample rate.

Another side, using wider (more 20…24 kHz) bands for DSD give more noise energy, that fast growth upper 24 kHz.

I.e. price of a better form of square is higher noise level.

Lesser ringing due to lesser steepness of DSD DAC filter (less ringing) leads to worse filtration. Thus it causes a higher noise level.

With increasing of PCM sample rate, steeper front/end of the square impulse may be achieved too.

I.e. no difference between DSD and PCM for restoring square. Values of sample rates and filter steepness are there only.

Now let me ask: why us need to restore ideal square for audio applications?

While only one solid practically proven theory exists: humans listen up to 20 kHz.

Sometimes we can see references to the article.

However, the article considers brain analysis of audio environment via principle dissimilar by Furie.
It allows discriminating short time quants of audio content.
However, there no word about new in mechanical capabilities of human ears - listening up to 20 kHz.

Therefore, why we need ideally re-create form of square impulse?

In audio applications we listen via ears, don’t watch via eyes.

So it is necessary to provide maximal fidelity in 0 … 20 kHz range.

It leads to visible (by eyes!) lesser steepness of fronts.

Anyway, inside our head, we have the same lesser steepness of front level, that ideally (theoretically) played back on speakers.

It is a feature of our ears.

So, why restoring of square form better, than can receive our ears, is needed?

Upper range, after restoring, can produce audible products due to non-linear distortions.

And the range will be analyzed via "principle dissimilar by Furie" :)




PCM vs DSD editing

Almost everybody knows that it is impossibly editing DSD "natively".

Here «native» means editing without intermediate converting to PCM. Such converting is "very-very bad"!

It's necessary to consider two things:

  1. What is PCM?
  2. Why intermediate converting to PCM is bad?

PCM is format with multi-bit samples. Adding bits to DSD change nothing.

Probably you listened "scary" phrase "destructive decimation".

Decimation is the simplest removing of excess samples to decrease sample rate.

Before decimation, the filter of all frequencies upper half output sample rate is applied, to avoid distortions in the audible range.

This filtering can cause ringing artifacts.

However, qualitative filtration has significantly lesser artifacts, than mixing and effect processing in music production.


Why conversion to PCM is needed?

PCM has no noise in the upper part of the spectrum. It allows to successfully apply non-linear processing (as for an example, overdrive/distortion effects) to musical stuff.

As an alternative, multi-bit DSD is suggested. However, "multibitness" allow solving only mixing and simplest multiply volume changing.

Elementary changing level to 1 dB cause trouble.

Multi-bit DSD has noise in the upper part of the spectrum too. Thus, to apply non-linear processing, converting DSD to "PCM" is desirable.

Also, it needs to remember, that computer can apply multibit math processing only.

End-user of the editing system should not worry about intermediate conversion(s). It is an engineer issue, how to find "hidden" possibilities and what "tricks" are need to apply.

It is necessary to consider editing system as a ready decision with given features at input and output.

Read more about DSD editing >



How to compare DSD and PCM sound quality


The main issue is DSD and PCM are technically impossible (including blind test) to compare as digital formats.

It is possible to compare only real systems, that use either PCM or DSD or both.

The systems must be considered as "black boxes" with input and output analog signal. These signals can be compared via spectral methods or hearing tests.

Final result depends on used recording, components, settings, technical decisions.


Frequently Asked Questions

What is DSD over PCM?

DSD over PCM (DoP) is special digital audio protocol to provide compatibility DAC interface and other device, in instance, computer.



Are DSD files better? Is DSD the best audio format?

In common case, DSD and PCM have own issues. However, a PCM DAC contains sigma-delta modulator (DSD conversion) inside to solve some digital-to-analog conversion issues. So, DSD DAC is more simplified than PCM one, theoretically.

Actually, audio device desing and recording quality is matter.



What is the highest quality audio file?

Lossless sound files are the highest quality audio files.





FLAC is PCM audio format. DSD may be packed into PCM as DoP.



Is DSD better than FLAC?

DSD isn't better or worse than FLAC. Audio system implementation makes it better or worse.



Is DSD better than MQA?

MQA is one of implementations of PCM format. We should compare DSD vs MQA as DSD vs PCM.



Can you convert PCM to DSD? Can PCM be converted to DSD?

Yes. You can convert PCM to DSD...


Can FLAC be converted to DSD?

Yes. FLAC may be converted to DSD. Read guide...


How do I convert mp3 to DSD?

Read guide how to convert mp3 to DSD here...


How do I convert DSF to FLAC?

Read how to convert DSF to FLAC in this guide...


Can Roon convert DSD to PCM?

Roon software can convert DSD to PCM when play DSD music.


Why does Roon convert DSD to PCM?

To playback DSD audio on PCM DAC, it's necessary to convert DSD to PCM. Read details...


Does Spotify have DSD?

Spotify doesn't have DSD streaming codec.

Look for DSD streaming...



Is DSD better than PCM? Conclusions


In simple words

Let's imagine that DSD music is house built of square bricks.

And PCM music is the same house built of rectangle bricks.

Both houses are plastered on the outside.

You can't distinguish one house from another.

However, both houses are built different teams. And they are different slightly.




  1. Digital audio format quality is identity degree of restored (from the digital form) and original analog waveforms.
  2. Comparison of DSD and PCM as pure digital formats is impossible by technical reasons. It needs to compare released systems, that use these formats.
  3. Editing of DSD files with qualitative intermediate conversion (decimation) to PCM give fewer distortions, than mixing and effects. So bottleneck is not there.
    For minimizing of losses, using of pro-quality algorithms and "hidden" technical possibilities (field for inventors) is recommended.
  4. "Native» DSD processing can be performed via multibit-DSD format. However, elementary operations are possible only.
  5. DSD is perfect as recording and end-user format due simpler (cheaper) apparatus than «native» (voltage matrix) PCM ADC/DAC.
  6. It is recommended to save master in music production project format (precise PCM). Further, it is possible to convert the master to any format: lossless PCM, DSD, lossy.

DSD PCM in music life cycle


Practical superiority of quality for each system is subject of engineer art, but not used format.

Use strong sides of each format in music ecosystem.


Read more about DSD
  1. What is DSD audio >
  2. DSD Decoder Audio >
  3. How work sigma delta modulation in audio >
  4. DSD Converter of Audio Files: What Inside? >
  5. What is Audio Formats DSD 2.8 DSD64 DSD5.6 DSD128 DSD256 DSD512 DSD1024 >
  6. DSD vs DSF vs DFF Files Audio. What is difference >
  7. DSF vs PCM. What is common base? >
  8. DSD versus FLAC (look to infographics) >


Author: ,
Audiophile Inventory's developer
June 21, 2022 updated  | since September 09, 2015


Read also

Why We Can't Compare Different Audio Formats >

DSD and PCM. Real competitors?



Follow us
Audiophile Inventory on YouTube Audiophile Inventory on Twitter Audiophile Inventory on Pinterest Audiophile Inventory on Telegram

Copyright © Yuri Korzunov
["Audiophile Inventory" (since 2011), "AudiVentory", "Audiophile Inventory by AudiVentory.com".
Также "Audiophile Inventory by AudiVentory.com" (прежде "Audiophile Inventory") охраняемое коммерческое обозначение],
2010-2022. All Rights Reserved.
All prices at this site in the U.S. dollars without V.A.T. and other applicable taxes and fees. The prices are recommended. All information at this site is not a public offer.

Read about supported formats and third-party codecs

Site map      Terms and Conditions  

For German shoppers: Subscription cancelling